> Because everybody starts their worklife with a huge salary? I don't see the point of this calculation. It's the simplest and quickest back-of-the-napkin calc

> Because everybody starts their worklife with a huge salary? I don't see the point of this calculation. It's the simplest and quickest back-of-the-napkin calculation to try to visualize what an income like this means. > The rich and super-rich don't show up whenever only income is considered. Any class definition based on income and not wealth is pointless. Which is my point properly explained, thanks.