> I wish this discussion could move on from this unfortunate, but minor semantic point to the substance It may be a minor semantic point to you, but it's half

> I wish this discussion could move on from this unfortunate, but minor semantic point to the substance It may be a minor semantic point to you, but it's half of what makes the headline a low-effort clickbait as typical for the "Zeit" since it goes against all common sense and why people take offense. The other half is the obvious flaw in the study, also typical for low-quality research that results in such left-populist articles, of asking people sensitive questions about their income (and perhaps wealth) and expecting valid responses. I wish we would move on to debating why this kind of trashy content gets so much attention and why certain people just crave for it to be published.