> When people quarrel over truthfulness is seldom the facts that they disagree on Eh, I think this now we are at a mostly semantic point: for example, there is

> When people quarrel over truthfulness is seldom the facts that they disagree on Eh, I think this now we are at a mostly semantic point: for example, there is nothing strange about arguing there exists some optimal weighting of various facts, and this optimal combination can then justifiably be labelled truth. > Not counting the type of bias which is not ashamed to twist the actual facts, but that is a rarity, and easily dismissed. Isolated instances are easily dismissed, but the USA is now ruled by a systematic dismissal of truth so it is not quite so easy.