3 ms·
I never argued that it was. I said breastfeeding leads to the least stress for mom, dad, and baby, in the general case, which is still true. Before boldly proc
by tathougies 7y ago
I never argued that it was. I said breastfeeding leads to the least stress for mom, dad, and baby, in the general case, which is still true.
Before boldly proclaiming winning in something that is not even a competition, I think it's worth it to understand the argument.
- eesmith 7y agoAt https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20683397 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20683397 you wrote: "Breastfeeding is a necessary part of taking care of a newborn ... plus the vital component of breastfeed" Now you say you didn't write that?
- TheSpiceIsLife 7y agoIt seems evident to me that @tathougies intended their statements to come with the 'when and where it makes sense to do so' aspect I mentioned earlier. Of course there's going to be circumstances where, for whatever reason, breastfeeding isn't optimal or even an option.
- eesmith 7y agoYour reading is more along the lines: "Breastfeeding - when and where it makes sense to do so - is a necessary part of taking care of a newborn that men cannot do."? Isn't that like "Wearing a bicycle helmet - when and where it makes sense to do so - is a necessary part of riding a bicycle." That is, your addition negates the seemingly firm statement of "necessary", while the later use of "vital" seems to support the firm intent of "necessary".