Yep, I think so. My point is more that supposably "green" solutions are not, and that you have to consider the total lifecycle of things. Personally, I favor

Yep, I think so. My point is more that supposably "green" solutions are not, and that you have to consider the total lifecycle of things. Personally, I favor things where the spoilage is contained. Say, nuclear over coal/nat gas because its far far easier to contain the waste byproducts of nuclear than a coal/nat gas plant. Want to flood an effectively dead desert in the rockies to make gigawatts of power? sounds worth it. Want to flood a vibrant ecosystem in the PNW or Northeast to make a few megawatts? please don't