3 ms·
I explain the difference below: "You couldn't sneak in a clause saying 'I get a 100% pay increase annually' -- in this case, they're the party being bound so wo
by boredguy8 16y ago
I explain the difference below: "You couldn't sneak in a clause saying 'I get a 100% pay increase annually' -- in this case, they're the party being bound so would need some indication of assent beyond just a paycheck." Similarly, the clause you identify means that Blockbuster is now the party that is bound. Renting you a movie with that clause isn't sufficient proof of acceptance, especially because there's no consideration that Blockbuster receives in return.
- tptacek 16y agoThat makes sense, and it's kind of a moot point, right; either way, Blockbuster isn't in a strong position to enforce a fine, and can simply refuse to rent to you again.
- randallsquared 16y agoRight, but then they'll hit your credit report, and you'll have to spend far more time than it's worth (at the least) to fix it.