> One could presume youtube has an extreme ideological agenda and has developed its algorithms in service to that agenda Their agenda is "more time spent watch

> One could presume youtube has an extreme ideological agenda and has developed its algorithms in service to that agenda Their agenda is "more time spent watching" = "more revenue" but theyve happened to induce a health crisis in the process. In this translation of engagement to dollars, Youtube has an ethical obligation to not actively promote content that is provably, unequivocally false and actively harmful to the public health, even if they continue to provide a platform for it. > You cannot call on these companies to be stewards of the world's information Youtube and Google already do these things. Not recommending videos is not censorship.