4 ms·

1. define enemy and prove the victim is. 2. are you suggesting protesting is a war which “perfectly acceptable” to use any violence at will?

faissaloo 7y ago
The state of China and its willing supporters are the enemy. It would be senseless to beat someone on your own side. Yes, protest is war if you're being attacked and invaded, the protestors have every right to slaughter their oppressors.
- thankswell 7y ago
  Are you suggesting the victim is "oppressors" to the protestors? Or, are you suggesting anyone from "The state of China" should be tagged as "enemy"? How do you define "willing supporters"? Did the victim attack protestors? How comes slaughter a human being (even if an enemy) becomes natural right in a civilized society?
  - faissaloo 7y ago
    >Are you suggesting the victim is "oppressors" to the protestors? Or, are you suggesting anyone from "The state of China" should be tagged as "enemy"? Anyone from China who given the chance does not surrender is fair game. >How comes slaughter a human being (even if an enemy) becomes natural right in a civilized society? If a party you have no prior social contract with endevours to threaten your existence you have every right to threaten theirs. Such people are undeserving of civility.
    - thankswell 7y ago
      > Anyone from China who given the chance does not surrender is fair game. Given what chance? from whom? Surrender to whom? It seems there's some authority that ppl have to comply with, and they should be "slaughtered" if not? This doesn't sound like democracy at all. > If a party you have no prior social contract with endevours to threaten your existence you have every right to threaten theirs. Such people are undeserving of civility. Who is threatening your existence? Is the victim in the video threatening anyone?
      - faissaloo 7y ago
        >This doesn't sound like democracy at all. I don't care for democracy. >Who is threatening your existence? No one atm, I just think China should be wiped off the map and its leaders executed in public.
        thankswell 7y ago
        > I don't care for democracy. Nothing to say about this :-) Just FYI I care democracy & so do HK ppl. > No one atm, I just think China should be wiped off the map and its leaders executed in public. The last person I knew who tried to wipe several countries off the map and execute its ppl is a poor German. Though he did write a book to defend his idea which is "persuasive" somehow. I'd suggest you start from there.
        faissaloo 7y ago
        >Just FYI I care democracy And yet somehow that feels untrue.
        thankswell 7y ago
        It doesn't matter at all as long as the democracy I care about is not about killing ppl at will.
        faissaloo 7y ago
        People will die either way. Some people are more deserving of death than others.

faissaloo 7y ago

The state of China and its willing supporters are the enemy. It would be senseless to beat someone on your own side. Yes, protest is war if you're being attacked and invaded, the protestors have every right to slaughter their oppressors.

thankswell 7y ago
Are you suggesting the victim is "oppressors" to the protestors? Or, are you suggesting anyone from "The state of China" should be tagged as "enemy"? How do you define "willing supporters"? Did the victim attack protestors? How comes slaughter a human being (even if an enemy) becomes natural right in a civilized society?
- faissaloo 7y ago
  >Are you suggesting the victim is "oppressors" to the protestors? Or, are you suggesting anyone from "The state of China" should be tagged as "enemy"? Anyone from China who given the chance does not surrender is fair game. >How comes slaughter a human being (even if an enemy) becomes natural right in a civilized society? If a party you have no prior social contract with endevours to threaten your existence you have every right to threaten theirs. Such people are undeserving of civility.
  - thankswell 7y ago
    > Anyone from China who given the chance does not surrender is fair game. Given what chance? from whom? Surrender to whom? It seems there's some authority that ppl have to comply with, and they should be "slaughtered" if not? This doesn't sound like democracy at all. > If a party you have no prior social contract with endevours to threaten your existence you have every right to threaten theirs. Such people are undeserving of civility. Who is threatening your existence? Is the victim in the video threatening anyone?
    - faissaloo 7y ago
      >This doesn't sound like democracy at all. I don't care for democracy. >Who is threatening your existence? No one atm, I just think China should be wiped off the map and its leaders executed in public.
      - thankswell 7y ago
        > I don't care for democracy. Nothing to say about this :-) Just FYI I care democracy & so do HK ppl. > No one atm, I just think China should be wiped off the map and its leaders executed in public. The last person I knew who tried to wipe several countries off the map and execute its ppl is a poor German. Though he did write a book to defend his idea which is "persuasive" somehow. I'd suggest you start from there.
        faissaloo 7y ago
        >Just FYI I care democracy And yet somehow that feels untrue.
        thankswell 7y ago
        It doesn't matter at all as long as the democracy I care about is not about killing ppl at will.
        faissaloo 7y ago
        People will die either way. Some people are more deserving of death than others.