> They lost ad impressions. Sure, that counts as revenue. It's not something I'm going to lose sleep over. I don't exactly think that advertisements should be

> They lost ad impressions. Sure, that counts as revenue. It's not something I'm going to lose sleep over. I don't exactly think that advertisements should be a profitable "feature" of the internet in its current form. > Why not? It's not like that they had any other options than trying to extract that information from ad-laden websites. You completely missed my point. Now that Google "owns" the data and provides the answer, the user won't need to click on a scummy site. Moreover, casual questions not answered directly by Google are answered by casual browsing. Casual browsing happens with ad blockers. If a site breaks when an ad blocker is in use, users exit the site.