3 ms·
I think its bullshit. Many businesses will continue to run this software for a long ass time and they shouldn't be forced to upgrade. Many universities have equ
by russdpale 7y ago
I think its bullshit. Many businesses will continue to run this software for a long ass time and they shouldn't be forced to upgrade. Many universities have equipment on window 98 or older, and many companies have computers still running office 2003 for various reasons.
- skinnymuch 7y agoIf support is ending, how is that forcing upgrades?
- cbsks 7y agoYou aren’t forced to upgrade, you just won’t get support from Microsoft. The support lifecycle for every Microsoft product is here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/hub/4095338/microsoft-lifecycle-policy https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/hub/4095338/microsoft-li... If you need to run software for longer than it is supported then you need to either need to negotiate a longer support contract, or be willing to live without support. I don’t think there is anything unreasonable about that.
- russdpale 7y agoSee, I think that is the wrong way of thinking about it. It gives the software manufacturer an asymmetrical advantage over the customer that I don't believe is fair. If the demand for the product is still there, the software manufacturer should be forced to support it with at least basic security upgrades. We are just asking to build an entire infrastructure on a shaky foundation because of some ridiculous dogmatic ideology to technological progress. Progress is great, but maintaining is what makes the world go around, just check out the salary of an experienced COBOL programmer.