Here is some very good discussion of (failed) attempts to replicate the study, and at least one possible methodological flaw that could invalidate some of the r

Here is some very good discussion of (failed) attempts to replicate the study, and at least one possible methodological flaw that could invalidate some of the results: http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2010/11/brief-note-daryl-bem-and-precognition.html http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2010/11/brief-note-dar... "The real lesson? This is the level of methodological scrutiny every paper should receive, and not just the ones you think are crazy: the ones you like and rely on for your own work should get a good working over like this too (especially these ones; and I'm as guilty on this as everyone else)."