3 ms·
That is a curious definition of need. Are landlords liable in your world for renting apartments to people who run ponzi schemes?
by Nasrudith 7y ago
That is a curious definition of need. Are landlords liable in your world for renting apartments to people who run ponzi schemes?
- martin_a 7y agoWhen they get to know about that fact and do not take steps to end this behaviour, although it would be in their possibilities, they might be held liable, too. So ocdtrekkies point stands, imho. Google is directly profiting from shady activities through their services and therefore has no incentive to control or stop that behaviour. That's a tricky thing.
- 4ntonius8lock 7y agoNot in my world; planet earth is a large place. But in the country I live in, the USA, landlords are liable for many things their tenants do. A friend of mine is a landlord and he almost lost a house he owns because his tenant was cooking meth in it. I don't remember the exact details, but the liability was no joke. P.S. I don't agree with this liability issue, I'm simply describing reality as it is.