3 ms·

Google’s currently helping to perpetuate the myth that New York is a growing city and its population is at an all-time high of 8.623 million. In reality, it’s a

Google’s currently helping to perpetuate the myth that New York is a growing city and its population is at an all-time high of 8.623 million. In reality, it’s a dying city, and the current best estimate is 8,398,748; every bureau except Staten Island is losing population. People are fleeing New York (both the city and upstate) due to high taxes, crumbling infrastructure, bad weather, and a generally poor standard of living. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/planning-level/nyc-population/current-future-populations.page https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/planning-level/nyc-popula...

rchaud 7y ago
Sure, but "nuance" and "context" is not what Google is trying to optimize for. They are going for the "instant fact check" audience, like the sidekick gophers on podcasts who look stuff up while the main host and their guest warbles on.
- skinnymuch 7y ago
  The parent included their biases no proof agenda in their comment. And that seems to be the primary reason for the comment in the first place. I’d say that’s worse than Google.
  - rlanday 7y ago
    I cited a government website showing that the population is off by over 200,000 people. I don’t know if you’ve ever lived in New York, but it’s full of world-class bullshitters, so much of what you hear about New York is bullshit. Bill de Blasio claimed there were 2 million people standing in Times Square for New Year’s. How in the world could that possibly be true?
overcast 7y ago
Am I reading this incorrectly? "Each of the city’s five boroughs registered gains in population. The Bronx saw the largest increase, up 3.4 percent, followed by Brooklyn (3.1 percent), Manhattan (2.7 percent), and Queens (2.2 percent); Staten Island showed the smallest gain (1.6 percent) over the 99-month period."
- skinnymuch 7y ago
  Next paragraph states there’s been declines mostly since 2016. And tables lower than that show declines from 2017.
skinnymuch 7y ago
The slight decline has been happening for two years. You can’t state a bunch of reasons over something that just started. As if you know those are the reasons.

rchaud 7y ago

Sure, but "nuance" and "context" is not what Google is trying to optimize for. They are going for the "instant fact check" audience, like the sidekick gophers on podcasts who look stuff up while the main host and their guest warbles on.

skinnymuch 7y ago
The parent included their biases no proof agenda in their comment. And that seems to be the primary reason for the comment in the first place. I’d say that’s worse than Google.
- rlanday 7y ago
  I cited a government website showing that the population is off by over 200,000 people. I don’t know if you’ve ever lived in New York, but it’s full of world-class bullshitters, so much of what you hear about New York is bullshit. Bill de Blasio claimed there were 2 million people standing in Times Square for New Year’s. How in the world could that possibly be true?

overcast 7y ago

Am I reading this incorrectly? "Each of the city’s five boroughs registered gains in population. The Bronx saw the largest increase, up 3.4 percent, followed by Brooklyn (3.1 percent), Manhattan (2.7 percent), and Queens (2.2 percent); Staten Island showed the smallest gain (1.6 percent) over the 99-month period."

skinnymuch 7y ago
Next paragraph states there’s been declines mostly since 2016. And tables lower than that show declines from 2017.

skinnymuch 7y ago

The slight decline has been happening for two years. You can’t state a bunch of reasons over something that just started. As if you know those are the reasons.