14 ms·
It's interesting that you chose a report more than a decade out of date rather than one of the more recent reports they have published.
by makerofspoons 7y ago
It's interesting that you chose a report more than a decade out of date rather than one of the more recent reports they have published.
- commandlinefan 7y agoWell, he kind of had to in order to make his point. As long as I’ve been alive (four and a half decades), they’ve been insisting that we have “only a decade years to save the planet” - so going back to a report from 10 years ago and comparing their 10-year-predictions against right now is a good way to figure out how concerned you should about their current 10-year-predictions.
- adrianN 7y ago"Save the world" has shifted goal posts considerably during this time.