Is there an issue with universal agreement in politics? If so, is it then political or merely logistical and practical concern? I dont think our polarized time

Is there an issue with universal agreement in politics? If so, is it then political or merely logistical and practical concern? I dont think our polarized times has to mean that all discord and disagreement is politics. For instance, we could disagree on the fundamentals of a topic yet agree on a solution and politically compromise to enact laws. For instance, how much regulation? Some say none, some say a lot, disagreement fundamentally, but politics is also about the subsequent agreement on compromise. In short, I dont think we can redefine politics as disagreement. Politics is more about social and rhetorical maneuvering towards a desired end state. That maneuvering is necessary due to conflict and disagreement, but the part is not the whole.