3 ms·
I'm curious what all we could throw out in a cTLS or uTLS to serve the power/RF constrained environments of IoTs. If we must have a new protocol, I'm keen on m
by cryptonector 7y ago
I'm curious what all we could throw out in a cTLS or uTLS to serve the power/RF constrained environments of IoTs.
If we must have a new protocol, I'm keen on making it as similar as possible to TLS 1.3 that the costs of designing, reviewing, implementing, and maintaining it, are much lower than that of a brand new protocol.
- bdamm 7y agoThere are SO MANY changes to be made for constrained devices. Just a couple quickies, certificate order is all backwards. Eliminate basically all use of DER, preferring CBOR instead. Define larger coarse protocol presets instead of dozens of optional extension points. Also TLS has no certificate caching, which for some radios is nearly fatal and will be a major issue with embedded and PQC. Etc..