I agree that credit is due to the wonderfully creative game designer, Mr. Pajitnov. I don't see this as contradictory to my point. > So no, it's not an "abstra

I agree that credit is due to the wonderfully creative game designer, Mr. Pajitnov. I don't see this as contradictory to my point. > So no, it's not an "abstract game with endless possibilities". Tetris is Tetris, a concrete game While protecting their IP in a court of law, The Tetris Company successfully argued that it does not exhibit scènes à faire because it is a purely abstract game. > Moreover, Xio does not dispute that Tetris is a purely fanciful game, meaning it has no grounding in the real world, unlike a video game simulating a karate match or a golf game. Therefore, the analyses in Data East and Incredible Technologies are largely inapplicable; the scènes à faire doctrine has little weight in instances such as this because there are no expressive elements “standard, stock, or common” to a unique puzzle game that is divorced from any real world representation. > https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/3:2009cv06115/235418/61/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jer...