3 ms·
...but a large part of the reason to ditch M:N was the overhead it added to 1:1-style IO in a language quickly moving toward the C++ space. They didn't decide
by Rusky 7y ago
...but a large part of the reason to ditch M:N was the overhead it added to 1:1-style IO in a language quickly moving toward the C++ space.
They didn't decide to move off of M:N when it was exclusively M:N.
- pcwalton 7y agoI was in the meetings where the decisions were made. The decision to add 1:1 in the first place was because of performance problems with M:N.