4 ms·
> and different definitions of "sane" It's even so to a point that it is funny that they use this word in such an argument. Who in their right mind would assum
by Erlich_Bachman 7y ago
> and different definitions of "sane"
It's even so to a point that it is funny that they use this word in such an argument. Who in their right mind would assume that "sane" (and "hypersane") would be an objective enough of a concept to even dedicate time discussing? Neither science knows what is sane, nor does spirituality teachings use that word often.
- dsego 7y agoThe terminology is used to paint a picture, not to introduce a new branch of science, it's not meant to be objective. It just poses a question, how can regular person tell the difference between someone who's lost their marbles and someone who is actually thinking more clearly than them by rejecting established norms.