2 ms·
There's a 2.5x improvement from serving AMP rather than HTML. There's also a 2.5x improvement from prefetching. The part that the article dismisses is the chang
by jsnell 7y ago
There's a 2.5x improvement from serving AMP rather than HTML. There's also a 2.5x improvement from prefetching. The part that the article dismisses is the change from just the AMP cache but without prefetching.
I think there's a pretty big difference between a few seconds and instant. Maybe you think the difference doesn't matter to the UX, and there's at least a discussion. But just going lalala and denying that the difference exists?
- gregable 7y agoIt's also worth noting that the cache is necessary for prefetching. Without the cache, the prefetch would leak user's query intent to an origin that the user has yet to decide to visit. This would violate the user's privacy, therefore a cache is necessary to achieve prefetch.