> It does look exactly like a blurry, distant photo of an Electra leg. At least for the sake of argument, I will grant that a blurry, distant photo of an Elect

> It does look exactly like a blurry, distant photo of an Electra leg. At least for the sake of argument, I will grant that a blurry, distant photo of an Electra leg might look exactly like this one, but in such a case, the exactitude would be in the correspondence of two blurred, small images, and that exactitude does not transfer to the identification of the imaged object as an Electra leg. You have to ask what else could produce a matching photograph, and if it is sufficiently distant and blurred, just about anything of approximately the right reflectivity would work.