4 ms·
> If a designer is interested in Ruby committers and wants to make it look pretty, then have fun! And if they're not, they still have the option of not partici
by jeffclark 16y ago
> If a designer is interested in Ruby committers and wants to make it look pretty, then have fun!
And if they're not, they still have the option of not participating!
That's what drives me nuts about all this "no-spec!/crowdsourcing is eeeevil!" chat on the Internet. Nobody's forcing anyone to participate.
There's a very (very, very) large group of people who only have $500 to spend on branding their company. If someone can't/won't spend $10k to a "branding agency", should they not be allowed to have a logo at all?
There are even MORE people who are willing to do a little work for the chance of winning $500 and seeing their work used by people not related to them.
Disclaimer: I used to work at crowdspring. I've literally seen both sides of hundreds of these contests. Nobody's evil and everyone participating knows the risks of participating. It's a win-win.
- tptacek 16y agoThere is indeed evil at Crowdspring and 99designs, though it's not on the offer side; designers routinely submit plagiarized work to contests. It's something you always have to be on the lookout for and it's a major downside of using those sites.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- lwhi 16y agoCreating an environment where people regularly work for the chance of being paid, is immoral imo. You can argue that no one forces these people to work - but that same argument could also be used by the proprietor of a child-labour camp or sweat shop.
- lwhi 16y agoOkay down-voters; please explain why I'm wrong.