4 ms·
I think all of the above comments hint at this but don't state this explicitly: One of the general problems with growth is that it always and necessarily plate
by khawkins 7y ago
I think all of the above comments hint at this but don't state this explicitly:
One of the general problems with growth is that it always and necessarily plateaus, and the growth stage has different dynamics compared to the plateau stage. When your town/business/country is growing it is easy to leverage the future because there is more wealth to spare.
In the growth period, investing in a new park/office space/spending program is totally rational if it helps improve growth and quality of life now, given that repaying that debt will be easy later. But once growth slows down, our expectations of progress must also wane. This is hard for many people to accept because they think that past growth was paid for with past success, when the reality is that it was paid for with current success.
- heymijo 7y ago> because they think that past growth was paid for with past success, when the reality is that it was paid for with current success. Wow, great contribution. I appreciate so much when anyone can pull a nugget out of my ramblings and explain it back to me in a clearer way. To add on to what you said and to bring this back to infrastructure, I think another challenge in the plateau phase is that you either need to spend a lot to keep old infrastructure working or massively reinvest to upgrade the infrastructure. If you've plateaued without expectations of future success, where do you get the funds to do either?