4 ms·
That makes absolutely no sense. You are saying that because person A offers nothing yet succeeds, person B is unable to succeed whether or not people think he o
by jcranberry 7y ago
That makes absolutely no sense. You are saying that because person A offers nothing yet succeeds, person B is unable to succeed whether or not people think he offers anything.
As long as you can succeed in spite of what other think you can offer, they are not the same.
- naasking 7y agoNice try on changing the goalposts. Success is not the value being compared, so your argument is immaterial. I had thought you were making a different argument in my last reply.
- jcranberry 7y agoWhat is the value being compared?