3 ms·

I wouldn't necessarily ascribe too much journalistic merit regarding your source link; it's quite clearly a biased source by design. A cursory glance at their

I wouldn't necessarily ascribe too much journalistic merit regarding your source link; it's quite clearly a biased source by design. A cursory glance at their home page reveals as much, and they spell it out clearly themselves. From their FAQ [1]: >What is OneNewsNow.com and who operates this site? OneNewsNow.com is the website of the American Family News Network (AFN), a national Christian news service. Our goal is to present the day's news from a biblical perspective. We not only feature the latest breaking stories from across the United States and around the world, but also news of the challenges facing Christians in today's society. [1] https://onenewsnow.com/general/faq/#1 https://onenewsnow.com/general/faq/#1

EGreg 7y ago
Sure, I just grabbed the first link I found about this fact that Gillette lost billions. Here are some more links about the same thing, with their CEO addressing it: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/gillette-ceo-8-billion-loss-is-price-worth-paying-over-metoo-campaign?_amp=true https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/gillette-ceo-8-billi... To be sure, there is no way to prove causation from correlation. Perhaps it was a giant coincidence in timing. But I wouldn’t say there is “NO” evidence to support the thesis that men got offended: There is no evidence that the "best a man can get" ads pushing back against sexism and bullying contributed to the $8 billion figure. https://qz.com/1680613/pgs-gillette-writes-off-8-billion-as-men-stop-shaving/amp/ https://qz.com/1680613/pgs-gillette-writes-off-8-billion-as-...