3 ms·
If the bank were really liable they would pay for the damage to the reporter's reputation and make a reasonable effort to set it right.
by IX-103 7y ago
If the bank were really liable they would pay for the damage to the reporter's reputation and make a reasonable effort to set it right.
- jdsully 7y agoI don’t see why he couldn’t sue the bank. Someone should try it.
- justin66 7y agoInteresting choice of words. Suing a bank is not the sort of thing you do because you're curious what will happen.
- jdsully 7y agoSmall claims is pretty accessible. This isn't exactly lawsuit of the century stuff - their actions defamed and harmed you monetarily which is exactly the sort of issue our tort system was setup to deal with. Note that if it was your own bank that defamed you, then you may have signed an arbitration agreement.