3 ms·
This statement is such nonsense in so many ways. First of all, comparing all nuclear research to solar and wind for civilian energy use is already bias. Second
by nickik 7y ago
This statement is such nonsense in so many ways. First of all, comparing all nuclear research to solar and wind for civilian energy use is already bias.
Second of all, people die on wind farms all the time. The death toll for wind farms is far higher then for civilian nuclear power.
Production of solar panels actually involves a whole lot of chemicals and those can leak and kill people. Not to mention that solar panels produce mountains not so nice waste and that people fall to death putting the panels up.
Nuclear power is the safest source of energy if we are going by actual data.
- lolc 7y ago> Nuclear power is the safest source of energy if we are going by actual data. It's nice to use geothermal energy from a volcano. But there are reasons we don't build more volcanoes.
- ptah 7y agoyou are going by the data SO FAR. it still has the potential to wipe out ecosystems continent-wide. you sound like the finance industry in 2006 speaking about MBS
- nickik 7y agoYes because the past is a great indicator most of the time. And the idea that civilan nuclear power can 'wipe out the ecosystem continent-wide' is just total and complete nonsense. Please actually inform yourself about the dangers of nuclear power. Chernobyl was about the most dangerous thing you can produce with that level of enrichmnet. Nothing in the West even comes close. And Fukushima was about the most dangerous thing that can happen with civilian reactor in the West and its not even close to 'wipe out ecosystesms'. In fact nobody died from radation because of Fukushima.