5 ms·
It’s a piece published in mass media. It does have an impact, a large one. > Columns are exeggarations meant to incite discussion We’re discussing it now.
by malvosenior 7y ago
It’s a piece published in mass media. It does have an impact, a large one.
> Columns are exeggarations meant to incite discussion
We’re discussing it now.
- armada651 7y agoIf you knew, then why did you state it as a fact by adding a "source" to it? > It’s a piece published in mass media. It does have an impact, a large one. But... it's the column section? It's not journalism. They're meant to be controversial and you can say anything you want no matter how far fetched. The author of this particular column is a writer of feminist literature so of course her views are going to be extreme. Are you saying mass media should stop the age-old tradition of the column section because people don't know how to read a newspaper anymore?
- malvosenior 7y ago> The author of this particular column is a writer of feminist literature so of course her views are going to be extreme. The Guardian is a mainstream publication, not an extremist one. They can publish whatever they want, I’m just saying this rhetoric is hateful, unhelpful and possibly part of the problem of male extremism mentioned in the OP.
- armada651 7y ago> I’m just saying this rhetoric is hateful, unhelpful and possibly part of the problem Except you didn't say that, instead you claimed all journalists in the mass media hold the views of one columnist in a left-leaning newspaper.
- malvosenior 7y ago> Except you didn't say that, instead you claimed all journalists in the mass media hold the views of one columnist in a left-leaning newspaper. I did not say that.
- armada651 7y ago> I think the “I drink male tears” coffee mugs as sipped by journalists at global media publications* (column used as source) I rest my case and don't claim that's not how you meant it, you knew exactly what you were implying.
- KptMarchewa 7y agoWhat's wrong with you?
- supercanuck 7y agosounds like he is being social excluded because he is a man.
- 420codebro 7y agoLook quick - this is what one calls a “cuckold”.
- jevgeni 7y agoYou can rest your case all you want, you're still wrong. The language in the original comment did not imply ALL journalists. You are arguing against your own misunderstanding.
- armada651 7y agoI claimed journalists in mass media as stated in the original comment. I concede that he did not say all of them, but it doesn't even back up the claim of a single journalist holding that view.
- dzamie 7y ago>But... it's the column section? It's not journalism. It is, however, a piece of work that the paper stands behind. If it were not, it should not be there; newspapers are curated, unlike, say, YouTube or a comments section. >Are you saying mass media should stop the age-old tradition of the column section We're saying they should exercise more discretion in what columns they publish. If they don't, they should give up any then-false pretense of being reliable, believable, reputable, etc. The local paper doesn't have to publish the column Crazy Herman sent in about how dragons are cultivating furries' minds for use as concubines, and doing so makes the paper look less respectable. Plus, in a lot of online media, the Opinion columns are often interwoven among actual reporting, making it less obvious which each is. Especially with this format, which columns they choose to publish become part of the paper's image... and even if unintended, "I drink male tears" columns gives the idea that that publication supports dismissiveness of the emotions of men.
- point78 7y agoSay anything you want is a lie. Let's see some real hate speech in a column targeted at minorities. You won't. So why should it be tolerated for any group.
- ljf 7y agoWhich part of the column was hate-speech?