Thanks, I didn't know about the `invalid` non-TLD. I've been using example.com. Still, it seems inappropriately opinionated for git to tie in and require an i

Thanks, I didn't know about the `invalid` non-TLD. I've been using example.com. Still, it seems inappropriately opinionated for git to tie in and require an identifier on a specific communication mode, even if we can come up with fake emails. And I dislike the extra bits of reduced anonymity (eg "correlate pseudonyms by which fake email they all use")