3 ms·
It's an interesting thought. You'd want to use a full bandwidth data channel (e.g. Bluetooth) for anything complicated. But for simple things, if possible with
by ethbro 7y ago
It's an interesting thought. You'd want to use a full bandwidth data channel (e.g. Bluetooth) for anything complicated.
But for simple things, if possible without affecting the other parts of the screen, it'd be amazing to have a broadly supported, low bandwidth standard.
- gugagore 7y agoI can't really make sense of the bandwidth (information rate) of a tactile interface. A measure in units of length would make more sense to me.
- namibj 7y agoIt's enough for knobs of 1 inch spacing or wider, no easy support for fancy geared knobs that coaxially have a rough setting and a fine adjustment.
- ethbro 7y agoAny digital control signal effectively has a minimum bandwidth. This might be as simple as "Here's my encoded position * frequency of sampling", but for a general interface you'd want something adaptable. What if there were two dials on the control? Two dials and three buttons? One dial, four buttons, and a joystick?