Assertion pretty obvious, non? (Of course a knowledge-based economy is going to pollute less than an industrial- and/or resource-driven one.) Then the first li

Assertion pretty obvious, non? (Of course a knowledge-based economy is going to pollute less than an industrial- and/or resource-driven one.) Then the first line of the author's thesis (more capitalism needed) doesn't follow from the premise: As China and Sweden demonstrate, advanced economies need not necessarily be strictly capitalist.