To me this article feels like someone working really hard to find an objection to something (may or may not be true, but it feels that way to me). The first li

To me this article feels like someone working really hard to find an objection to something (may or may not be true, but it feels that way to me). The first line of the article's conclusion is "Homoiconicity is a term surrounded by much confusion." I simply do not agree with this assertion. I was introduced to the term many years ago, and I have have read it in numerous contexts, and the meaning has been quite clear in every context I can recall. I also will keep using it the way I am now, since I see absolutely no reason to stop.