> That doesn’t mean the French controlled us. Who ever claimed that? My claim, quoting the previous message: "it is a fact, and not conspiracy theories, that

> That doesn’t mean the French controlled us. Who ever claimed that? My claim, quoting the previous message: "it is a fact, and not conspiracy theories, that a lot of the protests and their leaders are directly sponsored by some specific powers from the outside." What is there not true? What do you dispute from what I've written? > If we’ve learned one thing from the last century of American interventionism, it’s that prematurely prompting revolution So it seems you agree with me that there is such kind of sponsoring. Some more links: https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/03/15/trump-gutting-national-endowment-democracy-and-thats-good-thing https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/03/15/trump-gutting-... "The endowment is one of the main instruments by which the United States subverts and undermines foreign governments. In a less Orwellian world, it might be called the “National Endowment for Attacking Democracy.”" "Whenever the government of another country challenges or defies the United States, questions the value of unrestrained capitalism, limits the rights of foreign corporations, or adopts policies that we consider socialist, the Endowment swings into action. It pours over $170 million each year into labor unions, political factions, student clubs, civic groups, and other organizations dedicated to protecting or installing pro-American regimes. From Central America to Central Asia, it is a vivid and familiar face of US intervention." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Endowment_for_Democracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Endowment_for_Democra... "funded primarily through an annual allocation from the U.S. Congress "