4 ms·
Seems like the worst case scenario would be that some sites would be able to remove or prevent everything the administration doesn't agree with, and yet not be
by AdeptusAquinas 7y ago
Seems like the worst case scenario would be that some sites would be able to remove or prevent everything the administration doesn't agree with, and yet not be targeted by your FCC, while other sites would have to accept every contradictory or unbalanced post countering their content or be sued.
- MrSlovenia 7y agoIn that case the people could just file a joint lawsuit because their (non-governement) views have been censored.
- thebooktocome 7y agoWhen literally a quarter of federal judges have been appointed by this administration, do you seriously think that lawsuit is going to get a fair hearing?
- MrSlovenia 7y agoIf that will be the case then it's: a) a bad law b) institutions are corrupt: which means that no matter who is leading the goverment free speech will always be policed. And if the institutions really are that corrupt...well...then we're f* anyway
- daybreak 7y agoThis statement implies 75% of federal judges haven't, so the odds are good.