This seems like a symptom of the rules involved; when courts enable endless litigation, whoever can afford it comes out on top. If, on the other hand, legal mac

This seems like a symptom of the rules involved; when courts enable endless litigation, whoever can afford it comes out on top. If, on the other hand, legal machinations rewarded concise litigation (and public defenders were far more easily available and of high quality), I think the problem would be solved. On that note, what if our best lawyers became public defenders? What if we petitioned our government to make that job extremely high-paying and extremely competitive? It seems like a small edit to the system, that would create an immense amount of good.