It's probably insane, but this sort of 'rich seem to get an advantage in legal situations because of resources' issue makes me wonder how the world might work i

It's probably insane, but this sort of 'rich seem to get an advantage in legal situations because of resources' issue makes me wonder how the world might work if we actively restricted rights based on wealth. What if people and companies couldn't sue anyone poorer than themselves? How would that affect the legal system? Or if the richer party always had to pay the legal fees? Then again, on a more controversial level, what if actual human rights started vanishing as you crossed wealth thresholds? Would people and companies still want to be billionaires if that meant losing the right to vote?