Well the main argument is that the politicians want companies to invest from the tax cuts into more jobs. Where as companies, in reality, are just doing buy ba

Well the main argument is that the politicians want companies to invest from the tax cuts into more jobs. Where as companies, in reality, are just doing buy back which reward shareholders. Whether buy back is an investment or not is up to whoever definition's and I guess can be up for debate. But I think it derail the main point which is tax cuts and low federal rates aren't incentivizing companies into investing but instead buyback.