3 ms·
Sounds good to me. The moral argument is null and void considering we already participate in immesurable evil through mechanized industrial murder of billions o
by CriticalCathed 7y ago
Sounds good to me. The moral argument is null and void considering we already participate in immesurable evil through mechanized industrial murder of billions of animals for consumption. Killing them all, except a small breeding stock so we don't lose the genetic qualities of cattle, in order to save our environment seems like a very wise thing to do indeed. I'd vote for this in a heartbeat.
The only arguments against it are capitalist.