4 ms·
"Trickle down" economics is a strawman that mischaracterizes supply side economics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlWCnA7TbNU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
by OCASM 7y ago
"Trickle down" economics is a strawman that mischaracterizes supply side economics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlWCnA7TbNU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlWCnA7TbNU
- nothrabannosir 7y agoI am unfortunately not in a position to watch a 100min lecture at the moment. The Wikipedia entry for trickle down economics mentions it originated as a joke: The term "trickle-down" originated as a joke by humorist Will Rogers and today is often used to criticize economic policies which favor the wealthy or privileged while being framed as good for the average citizen. However, it goes on to say: David Stockman, who as Ronald Reagan's budget director championed Reagan's tax cuts at first, later became critical of them and told journalist William Greider that "supply-side economics" is the trickle-down idea: With a quote by David Stockman: ”It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle down,' so the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory.” — David Stockman, The Atlantic I’m sure the video touches on this, but do you have a summary for why it’s a straw man mischaracterisation?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- mattbreeden 7y agoIt's not really a strawman, it's just what people call it when they want to make fun of what people claim to be supply side economics. Whether or not the people who practice it or came up with it call it trickle down is completely irrelevant to discussing "trickle down" economics.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]