>What's good enough for the purposes of immigration control isn't necessarily good enough for the purposes of voting. Did you read section 2? The immigration e

>What's good enough for the purposes of immigration control isn't necessarily good enough for the purposes of voting. Did you read section 2? The immigration exam is only a third of the questions on my proposed ballot. >You want motivated immigrants who are willing to study in order to enter your country, but you don't necessarily want to restrict voting to the group of people who are most willing to put in effort, because that group includes everyone on the political fringe. Did you read section 3.1/3.2? Unless "the fringe" is 80% of people, voting will not be restricted to only the fringe under 3.1. It is less clear how the alternative proposal 3.2 skews the weights of extremists.