3 ms·
Too expensive "overhead" for IBM to develop? So rather, they employ 1000s of humans for the work? The math don't check out for me
by edoceo 7y ago
Too expensive "overhead" for IBM to develop? So rather, they employ 1000s of humans for the work? The math don't check out for me
- Nursie 7y agoI didn't say too expensive, I said it's an overhead, which it is. They have hundreds of thousands of people working for them, a few auditors is a drop in the ocean compared to making every software engineer cater for licensing.