3 ms·

This perspective was reached after a discussion with a top adviser of Trump, Clinton, Obama and other world leaders.

• ada1981 7y ago
  Its very HN to get downvoted for sharing a perspective and how one arrived at it. Acosta said the reason he didn’t give him a harsher sentence back in 2007 was because he “belonged to intelligence”. >> He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. << https://observer.com/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-spy-intelligence-work/ https://observer.com/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-spy-intelligenc...
  • ffff8888 7y ago
    Funny how you got downvoted even though this is correct. Nobody wants to face the possibility some of this might be true, it's too much to handle
  • kurthr 7y ago
    Wow, you literally have to go to Jared Kushner's magazine to find that out... of course there is other controversy as well, but it seems a bit self serving. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_Media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_Media
• kurthr 7y ago
  So you spoke with a political elite who has a vested interest in spinning the story... that's clarifying.