4 ms·

Basically mass incarnation?

giardini 7y ago
9HZZRfNlpR says> "Basically mass incarnation?" "mass incarnation"? Like https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.dL31G5Y3BQIg5Xv075saegHaHa&pid=Api&rs=1 https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.dL31G5Y3BQIg5Xv075saegHaHa&pi... ?? Is this some new Internet meme (e.g., "spam") that I missed?
- coldtea 7y ago
  Obviously means "mass incarceration" (throwing everybody to jail).
coldtea 7y ago
No, there will be a one year grace period, during which there would be voluntary turn in of guns + mass confiscation. If they still wont comply after one year, mass incarceration is an option. Alternatively people could be executed on sight.
- vageli 7y ago
  > If they still wont comply after one year, mass incarceration is an option. Alternatively people could be executed on sight. Surely this is in jest?
  - coldtea 7y ago
    It will be only slightly bloodier than current mass shootings, and not upon innocent (but on people breaking the law by having guns) at that!
    - randallsquared 7y ago
      You want to convert a tragedy into a statistic?
      - coldtea 7y ago
        No, I want to avoid it, so under that scheme, I would root for people to hand in their guns voluntarily! Now, if they want to make it a tragedy (and to perpetuate the current tragedies).
    - A4ET8a8uTh0 7y ago
      And it has an added benefit of a more pliable populace as the riffraff were forcibly removed and the remmnants are scarred and scared or simply overjoyed at finally arriving at the "no guns for lil people nirvana".
    - stale2002 7y ago
      So you'd kill millions? We are literally talking about millions of people who would refuse to follow this law. Seems like you are doing some sort of poes law parody of a gun grabber.
      - coldtea 7y ago
        >We are literally talking about millions of people who would refuse to follow this law Wouldn't then they be criminals? There are millions of people who have been in jail (even for BS like marijuana, which killed far less people than guns, well, literally 0 people), so what would be special about them? >Seems like you are doing some sort of poes law parody of a gun grabber. Yes, but I also like the thought experiment.
        stale2002 7y ago
        > Wouldn't then they be criminals? A lot of people justify genocide by calling the targets of their mass murder "criminals". We are absolutely not killing millions and millions of people in the US right now, as you are advocating for. No 1st world country is doing anything even close to what you are advocating, which is whole scale mass murder, on the same level of number of deaths, as all of the horrible genocides that the world talks about. Your suggestion of mass murder against millions and millions of people is well outside the realm of anything that 1st world country is even coming close to doing, and you can expect 10s of millions to fight this crazy mass mass murder plan. You'd probably have to kill not just the gun owners, but also all these 10s of people in pretty much every major 1st world country, as well, who vowed to never let anything like that happen again, who would fight back in the civil war that you created. (such a civil war would cause more deaths than all mass shootings in the entire world, put together, 10 times over)
        coldtea 7y ago
        Notice how the this obsession with "mass murder" is yours. I've suggested a no-deaths-whatsoever, totally legal process: make guns illegal, and have people hand them in to police. Peacefully. (In fact, to sweeten the deal, I'll now add that they will then get their money back (the price of the guns), plus a lollipop). To which you obsess that "Most/millions of gun owning people will never hand them in, even if it's made illegal to have a gun" and then pretend that the only alternatives are "gun ownership allowed" and "mass murder of millions".

9HZZRfNlpR says> "Basically mass incarnation?" "mass incarnation"? Like https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.dL31G5Y3BQIg5Xv075saegHaHa&pid=Api&rs=1 https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.dL31G5Y3BQIg5Xv075saegHaHa&pi... ?? Is this some new Internet meme (e.g., "spam") that I missed?

coldtea 7y ago
Obviously means "mass incarceration" (throwing everybody to jail).

coldtea 7y ago

No, there will be a one year grace period, during which there would be voluntary turn in of guns + mass confiscation. If they still wont comply after one year, mass incarceration is an option. Alternatively people could be executed on sight.

vageli 7y ago
> If they still wont comply after one year, mass incarceration is an option. Alternatively people could be executed on sight. Surely this is in jest?
- coldtea 7y ago
  It will be only slightly bloodier than current mass shootings, and not upon innocent (but on people breaking the law by having guns) at that!
  - randallsquared 7y ago
    You want to convert a tragedy into a statistic?
    - coldtea 7y ago
      No, I want to avoid it, so under that scheme, I would root for people to hand in their guns voluntarily! Now, if they want to make it a tragedy (and to perpetuate the current tragedies).
  - A4ET8a8uTh0 7y ago
    And it has an added benefit of a more pliable populace as the riffraff were forcibly removed and the remmnants are scarred and scared or simply overjoyed at finally arriving at the "no guns for lil people nirvana".
  - stale2002 7y ago
    So you'd kill millions? We are literally talking about millions of people who would refuse to follow this law. Seems like you are doing some sort of poes law parody of a gun grabber.
    - coldtea 7y ago
      >We are literally talking about millions of people who would refuse to follow this law Wouldn't then they be criminals? There are millions of people who have been in jail (even for BS like marijuana, which killed far less people than guns, well, literally 0 people), so what would be special about them? >Seems like you are doing some sort of poes law parody of a gun grabber. Yes, but I also like the thought experiment.
      - stale2002 7y ago
        > Wouldn't then they be criminals? A lot of people justify genocide by calling the targets of their mass murder "criminals". We are absolutely not killing millions and millions of people in the US right now, as you are advocating for. No 1st world country is doing anything even close to what you are advocating, which is whole scale mass murder, on the same level of number of deaths, as all of the horrible genocides that the world talks about. Your suggestion of mass murder against millions and millions of people is well outside the realm of anything that 1st world country is even coming close to doing, and you can expect 10s of millions to fight this crazy mass mass murder plan. You'd probably have to kill not just the gun owners, but also all these 10s of people in pretty much every major 1st world country, as well, who vowed to never let anything like that happen again, who would fight back in the civil war that you created. (such a civil war would cause more deaths than all mass shootings in the entire world, put together, 10 times over)
        coldtea 7y ago
        Notice how the this obsession with "mass murder" is yours. I've suggested a no-deaths-whatsoever, totally legal process: make guns illegal, and have people hand them in to police. Peacefully. (In fact, to sweeten the deal, I'll now add that they will then get their money back (the price of the guns), plus a lollipop). To which you obsess that "Most/millions of gun owning people will never hand them in, even if it's made illegal to have a gun" and then pretend that the only alternatives are "gun ownership allowed" and "mass murder of millions".