3 ms·
> No, not really, that doesn't seem like an interesting question at all. You say that, yet you went through the trouble of writing a reply that ponders this ex
by gridlockd 7y ago
> No, not really, that doesn't seem like an interesting question at all.
You say that, yet you went through the trouble of writing a reply that ponders this exact question: At what point does suicide become morally acceptable?
I do think it is an interesting question. I'd go the way of saying: If you still have serious responsibilities (as in this case), it is immoral.
It's worth noting that suicide used to be a serious offense - or even a capital offense, ironically.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- liability 7y agoI can think of many situations in which suicide is morally acceptable. I'd be very critical of anybody who asserts otherwise, that would be a much more interesting conversation to have, if only because I think I could really lay into anybody who disagreed with me on that matter. Whether prisoners should be able too is less interesting, so far I've not seen a compelling argument for permitting it. It seems like a perversion of justice to allow it.