4 ms·
> as a reward get all of their work seized by people who do not want or know how to use these "means of production". This is only true in some kind of socialis
by azaras 7y ago
> as a reward get all of their work seized by people who do not want or know how to use these "means of production".
This is only true in some kind of socialism, counterexample: mutalism.
- chr1 7y agoI am confused, According to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutualism_(economic_theory) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutualism_(economic_theory) mutalism does not advocate for social ownership of the means of production, so it's not what you meant in the previous comment.
- azaras 7y agoIn the previous comment: "social ownership of the means of production" Social ownership: can be public, collective or cooperative ownership, or citizen ownership of equity. Ref: 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
- chr1 7y ago> Social ownership: can be public, collective or cooperative ownership, or citizen ownership of equity. The problem with all of this, is that if someone works better than others, and creates his own "means of production" there must exist someone else who will seize it and distribute it to the collective, otherwise the means will again concentrate at the hands of lucky or more hardworking people.