3 ms·
Given that that was from 2000, what’s the current thinking? It feels like the sort of thing that 20 years advance in detection and modelling could easily prove
by robin_reala 7y ago
Given that that was from 2000, what’s the current thinking? It feels like the sort of thing that 20 years advance in detection and modelling could easily prove / disprove.
- cannedslime 7y agoI don't know... Paul Marmet died some time ago, and few are comfortable stepping outside of the big bang consensus.
- gus_massa 7y agoJust one of the first links in a Google search: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/molecular-astrophysics/highlighted-articles/how-hydrogen-in-space-is-made https://www.journals.elsevier.com/molecular-astrophysics/hig... It looks like some people is studding H2, so it is false that (now) everyone is ignoring H2. I think they don't think that H2 is so abundant that it explain most/all the dark matter.