3 ms·
I think they must be claiming a 20% improvement on the 90% baseline, otherwise it doesn't make any sense.
by Mvandenbergh 7y ago
I think they must be claiming a 20% improvement on the 90% baseline, otherwise it doesn't make any sense.
- marvin 7y agoOnce again emphasizing the importance of separating between percent and percentage point :P
- randallsquared 7y agoSo, 90% improved to 92%? That's not nothin'...
- beojan 7y agoThat's still impossible. 20% of 90% is 18%.
- callesgg 7y agoA 20% improvent would be a 20% closer to 100% specifically 20% out of the remaining 10% so 2% overall improvement. From 90% to 92%
- microcolonel 7y ago20% less energy dissipated as heat.
- dickbutt69 7y agoI assumed they mean overall efficiency of a vehicle since supposedly it won't be needing a gearbox and the writer of the article is an arsetard.