4 ms·

I take issue with "lower quality". Who is wise enough to judge? I say English is exactly how i write it. Or speak it. English is not stagnant. The epitome of hi

I take issue with "lower quality". Who is wise enough to judge? I say English is exactly how i write it. Or speak it. English is not stagnant. The epitome of high quality in your head now. Will be as quaint as chaucer in time to come.

lazylizard 7y ago
But yes. Doing things like not starting sentences with "because". Not writing down the ums n ers. Seem to go well with old folks.
lazylizard 7y ago
But ya. Usually i dun run things with the -vvv flag.
HenryBemis 7y ago
I always have a problem (me-my problem, not the other party's) when ome missuses the language, written or spoken, to spin something around and says A --> means B, "because language is a living thing and meanings change" to suit their message, but not the truth. The parent message was flagged, thus I didn't have a chance to read it, but from the above comments and your comments I get it that. > English is not stagnant No it's not, but potato means potato, and cancer means cancer. How you read it or speak it is your thing. And one of Quality's definitions is: "compliance to specifications". I would like to believe that the audience here is mostly high quality audience, I have to admit that language barriers exist that would make some people seem less eloquent, but by your definition we'll end up having "Idiocracy" (what humour, food, health, etc. may become).
- lazylizard 7y ago
  And inflammable means flammable...
- lazylizard 7y ago
  I think that "Idiocracy" idea is highly elitist. I'd for us to all be reading in search of lost time in the evenings. But hey playing fortnite n instagramming are the current consensus right? Who am i to say fortnite n instagram are low quality past times for idiots?
michaelmrose 7y ago
The fluid nature of the future evolution of the English language is hardly an excuse not to communicate according to a reasonable set of standards now much less a reason to deny any standards exist.
- lazylizard 7y ago
  I guess you're entitled to your opinions too!

lazylizard 7y ago

But yes. Doing things like not starting sentences with "because". Not writing down the ums n ers. Seem to go well with old folks.

lazylizard 7y ago

But ya. Usually i dun run things with the -vvv flag.

HenryBemis 7y ago

I always have a problem (me-my problem, not the other party's) when ome missuses the language, written or spoken, to spin something around and says A --> means B, "because language is a living thing and meanings change" to suit their message, but not the truth. The parent message was flagged, thus I didn't have a chance to read it, but from the above comments and your comments I get it that. > English is not stagnant No it's not, but potato means potato, and cancer means cancer. How you read it or speak it is your thing. And one of Quality's definitions is: "compliance to specifications". I would like to believe that the audience here is mostly high quality audience, I have to admit that language barriers exist that would make some people seem less eloquent, but by your definition we'll end up having "Idiocracy" (what humour, food, health, etc. may become).

lazylizard 7y ago
And inflammable means flammable...
lazylizard 7y ago
I think that "Idiocracy" idea is highly elitist. I'd for us to all be reading in search of lost time in the evenings. But hey playing fortnite n instagramming are the current consensus right? Who am i to say fortnite n instagram are low quality past times for idiots?

michaelmrose 7y ago

The fluid nature of the future evolution of the English language is hardly an excuse not to communicate according to a reasonable set of standards now much less a reason to deny any standards exist.

lazylizard 7y ago
I guess you're entitled to your opinions too!