5 ms·
Watch the documentary dude. Safechuck and Robson are legit. In addition to the other accusers. MJ was guilty as hell. They only testified on Michael’s defense
by dondawest 7y ago
Watch the documentary dude. Safechuck and Robson are legit. In addition to the other accusers. MJ was guilty as hell.
They only testified on Michael’s defense team under pressure and duress and witness tampering. Safechuck and Robson are definitely legit.
- jjeaff 7y agoI'd say MJ has a pretty good case for not guilty by reason of insanity. And I don't mean that as a jab. I really think he was so messed up by his abusive upbringing and subsequent life that he may not have been fully accountable. "Affluenza" on steroids.
- dondawest 7y agoNo dude. He was fully accountable. MJ was a ruthless business negotiatior. He bought the Beatles catalog out from under Paul McCartney’s nose after Paul had given him the idea. He negotiated the most lucrative contract of all time with Thriller. Michael Jackson was absolutely 100% mentally “all there” and fully accountable for his actions. Just because he was a terrible drug addict who molested kids while high as hell does not mean he was innocent, or “not guilty by reason of insanity.” Unless you think drunk drivers should be able to plead “temporary insanity from substance abuse,” there is no insanity defense for Michael Jackson. Zero insane people have the ability to negotiate contracts like MJ did. Michael was a ruthless and canny businessman and anyone who thinks he was “insane” is not familiar with the absolutely fiendish and dark level of planning he put into his rape career. The dude had silent alarms outside his bedroom. That shows a level of foresight and planning that would get an insanity defense thrown out of court instantly. in short Michael was guilty as hell and if you watch the documentary I bet you a million dollars you will renounce your “MJ truthing. “
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]