4 ms·
That seems to be about as accurate and helpful as any random and unknown layperson's "insight" something they don't understand. Or multi Nobel winner Linus Paul
by NeedMoreTea 7y ago
That seems to be about as accurate and helpful as any random and unknown layperson's "insight" something they don't understand. Or multi Nobel winner Linus Pauling's entirely misplaced obsession with vitamins, spawning a multi-billion dollar but pointless industry.
Why does this random aerospace engineer have any credibility on climate? What peer reviewed research has he on climate? How does knowing something about aerospace engineering provide insight on climate?
- lucb1e 7y agoWell I don't like to dismiss someone based on the argument that they didn't study for it. Hackers of all people know how effective self education can be. But yeah, in this case, there is nothing that makes him more qualified than the large number of professionals he's disagreeing with.
- NeedMoreTea 7y agoTrue, but then I'd hope to see something brought to the party a little more substantive than just shouting at the consensus. Maybe an attempt to show credibility, or humility if making a case for a previously undiscussed aspect or link etc.